




Hi! My name is Sarah. I'm a photojournalism and political science graduate from the University of Missouri. Will photo for food.





Radio: Glass and Abel
This was my first collegiate reading in the form of comic book. Seriously, I felt like I was reading ‘Sally Forth.’ I loved it. The reading focused on collecting and editing good audio for a radio story, but was applicable to any audio interview. Glass and Abel said, ‘a story can be told as a sequence of actions,’ and that a character was needed to relate to people and tie the story together.
I agreed with their pre-interviewing tactics: to go in with a general plan with key plot questions and then obtaining details whenever possible. One thing I need to improve upon is asking the subject to create a visual picture: where they were standing, what they were doing before ‘it’ happened, etc.
Lastly, I had never heard of logging and audio interview. I thought editing was listening in Audacity and cutting out the parts that didn’t make sense/weren’t relevant and then ordering it so it told a story. The idea of a log simplifies the process and creates a story automatically. Thank you, comic audio lesson.
Sound in the Story
Not quite as entertaining, but still useful. The reading was a very strict, to-the-point commentary about what to do and not do in an interview. Necessary, but redundant of things we have covered in other classes. Still, the refresher was nice. The components a good audio can piece include: interview, ambience, natural sound, voice-over and supplemental music. I’ve never questioned ambient sound as being inauthentic. The thought that some audio shows may incorporate sounds not from the story is shocking.
This week’s reading from Anne Lamott’s book Bird by Bird focused on character, plot and dialogue. While discussing character, Lamott requires answers to important character questions: why should we care about them? And what makes us want to know about them?
Especially in photojournalism, we strive to describe people without literal descriptions. Lamott gives the example of how teaching her son peace chants tells more about Lamott’s political beliefs than a more straightforward “these are my beliefs” description.
Also with characters, Lamott highlights on one of my weaknesses: not forcing your characters to be who you want them to be. One can’t choose what the characters do or how they act- they must be allowed to act on their own with you recording it.
Lastly, relating to plot, Lamott discusses a formula Alice Adams created for stories. The formula is ABDCE, standing for action, background, development, climax and ending. The similarities to the photo story formula (for lack of a better word) are obvious. A lede photo, detail scene setter, an interaction shot, a transition for development and lastly a closing. Both models are excellent starts to photo stories.
The readings for this assignment were both a history lesson in photojournalism. Langton began by giving a brief history of the camera and it’s awkward start with slow shutter speeds and portraits. As technology advanced, the camera became smaller and more versatile. I found it unbelievable that photographers had to bring their darkrooms around with them. Life and Look emerged as the industry’s leading photographic outlets and soon they featured a different medium to tell a story.
Chapnik traces the modern picture story back to a German publication and two photographers who discovered a relationship could exist between two images. His chapter on great photographic essays illustrates examples several photographers and their adventures in photo essays. Chapnik closes his reading with requirements (if you will) for a great photo essay: time, cooperation, an abandon of preconceptions, detail and most of all, passion.
The message I took from these readings was simple: do what has not been done before. We see many photo stories on drug abuse, but Bill Eppridge was the first to do it, and do it well. Gene Smith developed the modern photo essay himself, leading to thousands of stories. Obtaining the access these photographers had with no precursor is just downright amazing.
Lamott ties something as simple as school lunches into writing. Everyone had school lunches and using it as a writing start is an intelligent way to communicate. She writes with such common analogies, but really delves into the deeper meaning when relating them to writing. In writing these things, she finds truth. When first experimenting with photography, I would take the same picture over and over again. The things in the frame would be the same, but I would try it with different angles and distances.
Lamott describes writing a story like the slow forming of a Polaroid. I hope this is what my 30-day story will turn out to be. I see it forming, but then other components surface and the story may change, or become truer.
Hurn and Jay: Selecting a Subject
First of all, I loved their definition of the destination of photography: "to reveal what something or somebody looked like, under a particular set of conditions at a particular moment in time, and to transmit the result to others." Free from passion, but correct.
They pose questions that help to find a subject- something I definitely think will be useful in my quest for stories. Narrowing stories and relating them to something else, such as a moral has always been a struggle of mine. Hurn and Jay point out the struggle is universal. I don’t know if I agree with their claim that it’s necessary to incorporate photography into everything done every second of the day. Sometimes I enjoy not thinking about it, and I do not believe one has to be thinking of stimulating visuals all the time to be good.
I’ll start the response to this reading assignment with the above quote. While the same theory applies to photojournalism, I had never realized the truth in this career choice. People who report have a strong desire to experience, and then tell. I thought I wanted to travel through society and cultures because of photojournalism. The reality of the situation is that I am a photojournalist because I want to travel and explore.
Although this book is about writing rather than pictures, many things can be transferred. Lamott advises to write about everything. Start with your past, your memories, write about what happened to you on the playground while reading the Babysitters Club. The same can apply when learning to make pictures. Photograph your family, go to anything and everything and shoot a variety of sports, people and nature.
I think I’ll discover when starting a good photo story is that it doesn’t always turn out how it starts. Lamott says to start with a small piece and combine more small pieces to become a whole, rather than trying to photograph or write an entire story thinking of the entire story. She does an amazing job relating every day occurrences to writing and life: like Heidegger, she sees the bigger picture. When her throat muscles were cramping and closing due to the absence of her tonsils, the analogy of our psychic muscles cramping around our insecurities and pain was exceptional.
Lastly, Lamott engrained this into my skull: your work will not be perfect the first time. Most likely, the second time will still be flawed. But maybe, by the third or fourth time, satisfaction will settle.
Langton Reading: In Langton’s introduction, he describes newsworthiness and objectivity as it relates to photojournalism.
He points out sometimes costs effect the time and energy spent on a subject, rather than it’s actual newsworthiness. An example was a photographer who wanted to stay in Haiti to cover the peoples’ turmoil. He was told to stay if he could fund himself. Later however, Haiti’s government became international news with its corruption. What made it news one day and not the next?
Langton made me realize news photographs are more memorable and have a higher sense of purpose then other photographs. They affect the way people are educated and perceive the world. One of the duties photographers have is to show people the way they truly are.
Although I am spending the semester as a photo editor, one thing Langton said made me think about why I like shooting more than editing. The editor does not always know the story. Their perceptions and what they want the story to be can be different from the shots from the photographer. It is at this point, the photographer needs to clearly see what is newsworthy.

In an extremely moving piece, Matsui uses audio, interviews, video and photography to focus on the informational side rather than personal stories. The project was well mixed with video and photography starting out with a video and title text that I would like to incorporate into my final project.

For more dramatic text throughout the story, white letters appeared on a black background. The words were statistics, countries, or info clips. While this was extremely effective for the dramatic mood of the presentation, it is inappropriate for my project. The music throughout the piece was also fitting as was the speed of the photographs in accordance with the music.
Aside from the video at the beginning, the only other video was interview clips. To be honest, watching someone talk is much less appealing than having audio superimposed over pictures or other video. I will have no direct interview video in my project. The only part of this story I disliked was the too-quick transition from a sad story to happy, to sad again. Feeling a bit bipolar, at the end, I didn’t know if I should feel hopeful or cheerless. I will make sure my transitions in my project are clear.
Technically, the ability to hide the play/pause buttons and status bar is something I would like to learn. As a naturally distracted person, I catch myself looking at status bars instead of focusing on what I am watching. Is this possible in Flash?
The design of the story is very simple, with a white background and logo at the top of the page, and a small, informational sentence at the bottom of the page.

This project was a story about a woman from Africa who survived AIDS by taking anti-viral medicines after she had lost two partners and her son to the disease. Also, the story included the news anchor that has helped spread her success story to gain funding for other victims. The technical sides of the project were flawless. The audio was perfectly clear, pictures artistically done and the video even had picture overlays. The video included a button to make it large screen and volume controls with a way to skip to the beginning or end.
The user doesn’t have control of the project, as there is no interactivity besides play or pause buttons and chapters are not included. However, this adds to the simplicity of the story. AIDS isn’t an easy topic to develop with interactivity.
Aside from photographs, the piece had a live video interview which gave it a news story feel for legitimacy, but still kept the photo and personal feel. Photographs were inserted at visually expectant places and when we needed explanations, interview video was played. The slow transitioning of the pictures and the breaking up of pictures in Flash was very well done. I would like to include how some pictures fade-in in pieces in my final project.
The surrounding color scheme was the only thing I hated. The MSNBC logo was necessary, but the bright color montage in the background was distracting and inappropriate for the content. A black background would have been much more effective. A side bar also appeared next to the piece, but was not distracting.